2024年4月13日托福词汇、口语、写作考题大预测
2024-04-19 11:17:12 编辑：无 浏览：(593次)
We have recently read in our textbook that local or regional governments often need to reduce the amount of money budgeted in some areas in response to economic shortfalls. For instance, a city council may make the difficult decision to spend less on a certain public service for its residents. In your view, in what one or two areas should local or regional governments reduce spending when budget cuts are necessary? Why?
My city has a lot of parks that require a lot of upkeep. If there's a need to reduce expenses, the city could make changes to the parks that make them less expensive to maintain. For example, grass lawns, which need to be cut weekly, could be replaced with other plant species that do not need to be cut frequently.
Last time I went to City Hall to take care of some business, I saw a lot of employees standing around and doing nothing. I think the local government may be employing too many workers. It was just an impression I had, but I wonder if this is something that should be reviewed.
1. One area where expenditure could be curtailed is extravagant public events.
2. Spending on new infrastructure projects could also be deferred.
3. Another area where local governments could consider reducing spending is in the field of aesthetic city improvements.
4. A potential area for budget cuts could be the reduction of subsidies given to non-essential sectors or industries.
I agree with the notion that local or regional governments should reduce spending on non-essential services when budget cuts are necessary. Firstly, one area where expenditure could be curtailed is extravagant public events. This is because, while such events may boost community morale and tourism, they are not vital to the everyday functioning of a city or region. Scaling back on such affairs would save a considerable amount of money without drastically impacting the quality of life for residents. Secondly, spending on new infrastructure projects could also be deferred. To be specific, projects such as erecting new buildings or implementing advanced technology systems can be postponed until the economy recovers. This does not mean neglecting maintenance of existing infrastructure, but rather prioritizing the use of funds. In conclusion, when budget cuts are necessary, I believe it is prudent for governments to reduce spending on non-essential services like public events and new infrastructure projects.
以上老师的专业分析有没有把你的写作思路打开呢？利用下面的预测题练习起来吧！
This week's course materials will focus on scientific discoveries, while scientific researchers usually prefer to share what they learn with other scientists, many businesses and governments keep certain scientific discoveries secret.
Some people believe that all scientific discoveries should be shared freely among scientists all around the world and that governments and businesses should not keep any discoveries secret. what do you believe and why?
I don't think all discoveries should be shared, businesses, for example, often spend a lot of money on scientific research in order to make a discovery that can lead to profit. Even if that discovery benefits everyone, the business has a right to keep the discovery secret so that it can develop a profitable product from the research.
Sharing knowledge is crucially important to most scientists. Scientists usually publish the details of their discoveries in scientific journals, which means that everyone can see what the scientists have accomplished, Being recognized as the person who made a discovery is the biggest reward for any scientist. When scientists keep their discoveries secret, they lose that recognition. That is very unsatisfying.
In this course, we've been studying current events and discussing the value of being educated consumers of news. However, there is also an opinion that we should periodically limit our exposure to current events and even take breaks from the news. Do you think it is beneficial to take breaks from reading or watching the news for a period of a few days or weeks? Why or why not?
Beneficial or not, it would be impossible. Today, we're exposed to the news everywhere-on our phones, on our computers, on big TV screens in waiting rooms and in airport lounges. To take a break from the news, you would have to withdraw from all activities in society, which is unrealistic.
I think that taking a break from the news could be helpful psychologically. It obviously depends on how long a break we take. Completely avoiding watching or reading the news may be too extreme, but taking a short break from the news could help us avoid news stories that may affect us negatively.
Today, we're exploring the impacts of children caring for pets. Some people believe that taking care of animals like dogs or cats can teach kids responsibility, empathy, and even improve their social skills. Can having a pet benefit children in their development? What do you think about the idea of kids raising pets? Share your thoughts on whether children benefit from caring for a pet and how this experience might influence their growth and development.
I think children benefit from raising pets, fostering a sense of responsibility and empathy. Additionally, nurturing scientific curiosity is crucial for their development. Encouraging hands-on experiments and interactive learning in science enhances critical thinking and problem-solving skills. By combining pet care with scientific exploration, we can help kids develop a well-rounded set of skills.
I believe it's not beneficial for kids to raise pets as it's often the parents who end up caring for them. Children might lack the responsibility needed for proper pet care. Moreover, pets require consistent attention, which can be challenging for kids managing school and activities. This situation often results in parents taking on the primary caregiving role.
Today, we're exploring the enduring impact of traditional media in our modern society. Despite the emergence of digital platforms, traditional media such as television and books continue to wield significant influence. Now, considering their impact on shaping perspectives and opinions, I'd like your insights. In your view, do you believe television holds greater importance, or do books exert a stronger impact on individuals in today's society? Explain the reasons behind your perspective, considering their respective reach and engagement.
Unlike books that require literacy skills and resources, television offers information readily available to a vast audience. Its audio-visual nature captivates diverse demographics, reaching individuals regardless of literacy levels. For instance, television news broadcasts reach millions instantly, shaping collective perspectives. Its immediacy and visual storytelling also create lasting impressions, influencing opinions and societal views more directly compared to the slower, more introspective impact of books.
Books wield greater influence in modern society owing to their ability to convey specialized and in-depth knowledge. Unlike television, which often presents condensed or generalized information, books delve profoundly into various subjects, providing comprehensive insights and expertise. This depth allows readers to explore diverse perspectives, fostering critical thinking and nuanced opinions based on substantial information.
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Students should always be allowed to make video recordings of their professors' lectures.
Use details and examples to explain your opinion.
1. Accessibility: Video recordings can be paused, rewound, or re-watched, making it easier for students to review complex concepts at their own pace.
2. Flexibility: It allows students who missed a class due to illness or other reasons to catch up on the missed material.
1. Privacy Concerns: Professors might feel uncomfortable, and there could be potential misuse of the recorded material.
(备注：独立话题一定要贴近生活、易于阐述，不要朝着版权这种不熟悉的思路走，比如misuse可以是老师还没有发表的文章)
2. Reduced Engagement: If lectures are recorded, students may be less likely to attend classes and engage in discussions, reducing the interactive aspect of learning.
Your university is considering a policy in which professors will only be eligible for promotions and pay raises if they have received positive evaluations of their teaching from students. Do you agree with this policy? Explain why or why not, using specificexamples and details.
答题思路
For:
1. Improve Teaching: engage students and facilitate understanding → e.g., history professor + visual aids
2. Increase interaction: students struggle with academic challenges → professors extend a helping hand
Against:
1. Can’t Reflect Teaching Ability: e.g., a demanding professor → challenge students → negative evaluations → but lasting benefits
2. Manipulation: Students could potentially misuse the evaluation system → discourage research-focused professors → peer reviews + research contributions should be considered
范文参考
My university is considering a policy in which professors will only be eligible for promotions and pay raises if they’ve received positive evaluations of their teaching from students. I agree with this.
Firstly, this policy could motivate professors to improve their teaching, thus facilitating better comprehension. For instance, a history professor could use images or videos of important people and places to enhance students’ understanding of the topics being discussed.
Furthermore, the proposed policy encourages increased interaction between professors and students. We know that many students struggle with academic challenges, so professors would be more likely to offer additional support, such as extra office hours. This could lead to a more effective learning environment.
(备注：语速不足，最后一句可以不要)
皖公网安备 34050302000774号